不同人群埃博拉疫情敏感词相关性认知差异的研究  

Cognition difference of different populations to sensitive words related with Ebola epidemic

作　　者：王皖曦 杨国愉[1] 晏玲[1,2] 赵梦雪[1] 王立菲[1] 何楠[3] 刘志峰[4] 路金凤 

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军首批援利医疗队第三军医大学心理学院军人发展与教育心理学教研室,重庆400038 [2]中国人民解放军首批援利医疗队第三军医大学西南医院儿科,重庆400038 [3]解放军第201医院综合科,辽宁辽阳111000 [4]解放军第230医院肾内科,辽宁丹东118000

出　　处：《第三军医大学学报》2015年第20期2067-2071,共5页Journal of Third Military Medical University

基　　金：全军医药卫生“十二五”重大项目(AWS13J003);国家社会科学基金(11XSH016);军队心理卫生科研基金(12XLZ219)~~

摘　　要：目的以2014年2月西非开始大规模暴发埃博拉疫情为背景,研究不同国籍、不同职业、不同性别人群在公共安全风险事件中对事件敏感词的认知差异。方法从新闻报道、文献资料中选取与埃博拉有关的单词(词组)173个,邀请疫情重灾区利比里亚和中国的不同职业、性别的民众对选词与埃博拉疫情相关性进行5级评分,共回收有效问卷256份,使用SPSS 18.0对数据结果进行单因素分析、配对样本一致性检验和相关性检验。结果 1不同人群认知的一致性:医护人员、社区工作者和医学院学生3类人群认知一致性差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),不同国籍、不同性别人群认知一致性差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。2不同人群对敏感词认知差异:医护人员、社区工作者和医学院学生3类人群对敏感词认知存在差异,其中医护人员与社区工作者认知显著相关(P<0.05),不同国籍人群对敏感词认知不存在统计学差异(P>0.05),不同性别人群对敏感词认知显著相关(P<0.01)。结论不同人群在对埃博拉疫情事件词认知的一致性和对埃博拉敏感词相关性认知上是存在差异的,职业、国籍等社会因素对敏感词相关性认知的影响相对较高。Objective To investigate the cognition difference of different populations with different nationalities, occupations and genders to Ebola-related sensitive words in risk events on the background of Ebola epidemic outbreak in West Africa, February, 2014. Methods A total of 173 Ebola-related words were selected from news reports and academic papers, and populations with different occupations and genders from China and Liberia were invited to judge the correlation between the selected words and Ebola epidemic with five-level scores. The questionnaires of 256 test objects were analyzed with Software SPSS 18.0. Results The medical staffs, community workers and medical students had significant differences in the consistency of cognition （P 〈 0. 01 ）, and the populations with different nationalities and genders also had significant difference in the consistency of cognition （P 〈 0. 01 ）. The cognitions of the medical staffs, community workers and medical students to the sensitive words were different, and the cognitions of the medical staffs and community workers were significantly correlated （P 〈 0. 05 ）. The cognitions of the populations with different nationalities to the sensitive words were different （ P 〉 O. 05 ）, and the cognitions of the populations with different genders were significantly correlated （ P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusion The cognition consistency and the cognition to Ebola-related sensitive words have significant differences among different populations, The influence of social factors such as occupations and nationalities on the cognition to the sensitive words may be greater than that of the factors such as genders.

关 键 词：埃博拉 利比里亚 风险事件 敏感词 认知 

分 类 号：R195.4[医药卫生—卫生统计学] R395.9[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]