检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李宝林[1] 孔庆波[1] 赵巍[1] 马力学[1] 赵建罡[1]
出 处:《中华全科医师杂志》2015年第10期781-783,共3页Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
摘 要:对2012年1月至2014年10月收治的98例持续性跟痛症患者分别行体外冲击波治疗(治疗组)和红外线物理治疗(对照组),每组49例,治疗4周为1个疗程,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)进行评定。治疗结束时VAS足部疼痛和功能评分治疗组为(39.6±6.2)和(25.1±4.6)分、对照组为(32.3±6.5)和(17.4±7.2)分,与治疗前的(16.5±4.6)和(14.4±8.6)分、(16.1±4.7)和(14.6±8.4)分相比,两组足部疼痛明显减轻、功能改善(均P〈0.05);治疗结束后4周随访,治疗组有效率65%(32/49)、改善率31%(15/49),好于对照组的27%(13/49)和63%(31/49)(均P〈0.05)。体外冲击波治疗持续性跟骨痛效果显著,疗效优于物理疗法,适合临床应用。To explore the therapeutic efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) for persistent heel pain. A total of 98 patients of persistent heel pain were randomly divided into ESW treatment and control groups (n = 49 each). Treatment group had ESW while control group received infrared physical therapy. And their visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed. After one course of treatment, VAS heel pain and function scores were (39. 6 -+ 6. 2 ) and (25. 1 + 4. 6 ) in ESW group versus (32. 3 + 6. 5 ) and ( 17. 4 ~ 7. 2) in control group. And before treatment, ( 16. 5 ~ 4. 6) and ( 14.4 ~ 8. 6), ( 16. 1 ~ 4. 7 ) and ( 14. 6 ~ 8. 4 ) respectively. Heel pain significantly decreased with functional improvement ( all P 〈 O. 05 ). After one course, the effective rate was 65% (32/49) in treatment group. And the improvement rate of 31% (15/49) was better than control group [27% (13/49) and 63% (31/49) ] (all P 〈0.05). ESW treatment of persistent heel pain was more efficacious than physical therapy and it could be applied clinically.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.126.159