幻想还是理想:哈贝马斯协商民主批判之批判  

Fantasy or Ideal: Criticizing the Criticism of Habermas' s Deliberative Democracy

作　　者：甘莅豪[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学传播学院

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2015年第10期63-70,共8页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"突发事件政府应急话语技术与形象修复策略研究"(13CXW040)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：现代国家治理的民主起源于两种内涵:自由主义和共和主义。然而这两种民主模式却各有问题,自由主义民主可以保障人权,却忽视了资本对人的异化作用,共和主义民主强调人民主权,却有陷入"暴政"的危险。由此,哈贝马斯提出的协商民主观,试图超越这两种民主模式,为各国国家治理提供新的思路。然而,当今学界对哈贝马斯的协商民主一直有各种批判观点,因此,对这些批判观点再分析,对重新理解哈贝马斯协商民主有重要意义。The democracy of modern state governance originates in two connotations： Liberalism and republicanism. However, the two models of democracy have their own problems. Liberal democ- racy can guarantee human rights, but ignores the alienation of human from Capital. Republic democ- racy emphasizes the sovereignty of the people, but falls into the dangerous situation of ＂tyranny＂. Thus, Habermas puts forward the concept of deliberative democracy, tries to transcend these two kind of democratic models, and provides a new idea for the national governance. However, there are variety of critical perspectives about deliberative democracy in the academic circles. If we can analyse further these critical points, we can reunderstand the important significance of Habermasg deliberative democracy.

关 键 词：国家治理 自由主义民主 共和主义民主 协商民主 批判 

分 类 号：D082[政治法律—政治学]