检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《政法论丛》2015年第5期79-87,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law
摘 要:我国借鉴和学习苏联的经验建立了自己的社会主义检察制度,其中民事检察权遭到的非议最多。通过分析,可以看出将民事检察权的性质归结为行政权、司法权都不科学,主流观点根据宪法得出的法律监督权并不能准确全面地诠释检察权的性质。民事检察权是独立存在的一种特殊的权力,它亟需加强。司法改革为民事检察权提供了难得的发展契机。Our country for reference and learning experience of the Soviet union set up his own socialist procu- ratorial system, including civil procuratorial authority has been the most criticist. By analyzing, we can see that the civil procuratorial authority due to the nature of administrative power and judicial power is not scientific, the main- stream view in accordance with the constitution of legal supervision and can not accurately comprehensively interpret the nature of prosecutorial power. Civil prosecutorial power is independent of a special kind of power, it needs to be strengthened. Judicial reform for civil procuratorial authority provides a rare development opportunity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33