审判委员会改革的模式设计、基本路径及对策  

The Mode Design,Basic Path and Countermeasures of the Judicial Committee's Reform

作　　者：张卫彬[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学法学院,安徽蚌埠233030

出　　处：《现代法学》2015年第5期23-32,共10页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"中国拥有南沙群岛主权证据问题研究"(14BFX189)

摘　　要：党的十八届三中全会和四中全会均提出了完善主审法官、合议庭办案责任制,让审理者裁判、由裁判者负责制度。由此,审判委员会制度的改革势在必行。实际上,学界对审判委员会制度存废的讨论由来已久。各级法院也在尝试采取各种改革措施,回应社会的批评和建议。基于国内目前司法运行环境和基础条件等因素,审判委员会不宜被废除,但应创新制度安排的理念,对其改革进行顶层设计。同时,可以修改国内相关法律,突破现有的二元制审判体制为"二元半体制"——"一审+二审/审判委员会",在审委会内部设立大审判庭,并按照案件性质对审委会委员进行专业分工,明确赋予其就重大和疑难的个案进行审判的权能及问责机制,同时,积极发挥审判委员会的监督、咨询职能。Both the CCP＇s 3rd and 4th Plenary of 18 th Session have advocated to improve the selection mechanism of presiding judges,and to clarify the court responsibility,namely ＂Judge tries,judge be held responsible＂.We can conclude that the reformation of Judicial Committee is imperative.In fact,the discussion about whether to abolish the establishment has been lasted for a long time.The court at all levels has been trying to take all kinds of measures to respond to the critics and recommendations.Considering the current factors of judicial environment and basic conditions,creative conceptions and top level designs are required in the arrangement of the system instead of simple abandonment.Meanwhile,we may make a breakthrough by revising the relative domestic law to add a half to the present binary system.That is to say,＂first instance ＋ second instance＂plus the Trial Committee.The Judicial Committee has authority to deal with difficult and important specific cases.At the same time,the functions of supervision and consultation should be exerted positively.

关 键 词：审委会 改革模式设计 职能归位 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]