n-TEP和TIPP术后腹股沟疝患者生活质量的对比研究  

Clinical control study in quality of life following n-TEP verus TIPP inguinal hernia repair

作　　者：葛永祥[1] 刘庆宏[1] 程国昌[1] 曹赣[1] 田野[2] 

机构地区：[1]泰州市人民医院手术室,江苏省225300 [2]泰州市人民医院普外科,江苏省225300

出　　处：《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版）》2015年第5期66-68,共3页Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)

摘　　要：目的比较腹腔镜全腹膜外不钉合补片植入术(n-TEP)和经腹股沟腹膜前补片植入术(TIPP)治疗腹股沟疝后对生活质量的影响。方法回顾分析2011年1月至2013年1月,泰州市人民医院行n-TEP和TIPP的患者89例的临床资料,随访6个月以上均无复发患者,本研究对比二者在术后疼痛、术后生活质量(QOL)方面的差异。结果二组比较,n-TEP组能减少术后慢性疼痛,提高患者术后生活质量。结论 n-TEP术和TIPP术同样安全、有效,因术后疼痛较轻,患者生活质量得到提高,在患者条件允许的情况下应当作腹股沟疝治疗首选的手术方式。Objective To compare the quality of life in patients with inguinal hernia after n-TEP with TIPP. Methods From January 2011 to January 2013,a retrospective analysis was conducted on 89 patients with inguinal hernia who were performed with either n-TEP（ n = 38） or TIPP（ n = 51） in Taizhou People＇s hospital. No recurrence was found after a period of follow-up for more than 6 months. The differences in postoperative pain and quality of life（ QOL） of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with TIPP group,n-TEP group could reduce postoperative chronic pain,and improve the QOL.Conclusion Both n-TEP and TIPP repair were safe and effective. While if patient＇s condition is permitted,the former should be the preferred procedure that can reduce pain and improve QOL.

关 键 词：疝 腹股沟 腹腔镜全腹膜外不钉合补片植入术 经腹股沟腹膜前补片植入术 生活质量 

分 类 号：R656.21[医药卫生—外科学]