检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学生命与环境科学学院,北京100081
出 处:《贵州农业科学》2015年第9期87-90,共4页Guizhou Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家外专局和教育部支撑的高等学校学科创新引智计划(111计划)(2008-B08044);中央民族大学一流大学一流学科建设项目(YLDX01013);中央民族大学自主科研项目(MUC2011ZDKT09)
摘 要:为探讨贵州省雷山县不同类型的林地土壤肥力差异,揭示不同类型林地土壤肥力与林木生长关系,保证森林的合理开发利用。对阔叶林、针阔混交林和针叶林3种林地采集的土壤样本进行了机械组成及9个肥力指标的检测和对比分析。结果表明,3种林地的有机质、全N、碱解N、全K和速效K含量达显著差异(p<0.05);有效P和阳离子交换量(CEC)达极显著差异(p<0.01);pH值和全P含量未达到显著性差异;3种类型林地的土壤肥力整体水平存在极显著差异(p<0.01),土壤肥力水平表现为针阔混交林>阔叶林>针叶林。In order to study the difference of the soil fertility of three different forestlands in Leishan County of Guizhou, reveal the relationship between soil fertility of different forest types and forest growth, and to ensure the rational development and utilization of forest. Soil samples were collected in three forest lands, including broad-leaved forest, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest and coniferous forest, mechanical composition and nine soil fertility indexes were examined and the differences of the three forestland types were compared. Results showed that the organic matter, total N, available N, total K and quacking K were significantly different (p 〈 0. 05). The valid P and CEC were significantly different (p〈0.01). However, the total P and pH were not significantly different. The whole level of soil fertility of three forestlands were significantly different (p〈0. 01), the soil fertility form high to low was coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest〉broad-leaved forest 〉coniferous forest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28