承继共同正犯的责任范围  

The Liability of Successive Co-perpetrator

作　　者：陈晨[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2015年第4期109-116,174-175,共8页Journal of National Prosecutors College

摘　　要：厘清承继共同正犯的责任范围不仅有助于解决司法实践中的问题,而且还能够将该问题与共同犯罪相衔接,蕴含丰富的理论价值。围绕承继共同正犯的责任有全面肯定说、全面否定说以及限定肯定说等不同观点,各种观点的理论基础与司法适用结果都有较大区别。通过比较和分析,限定肯定说的观点更具有科学性与合理性,不仅贯彻了因果共犯论的主张,也能够将刑法中的个人责任原则进行贯彻。Clarifying the liability of successive co-perpetrator is of abundant theoretical value,which not only contributes to solve problems existing in juridical practice,but also make this problem to engage with the joint crime. There are full affirmation theory,full negation theory and limited affirmation theory about the liability of successive co-perpetrator,but the theoretical basis of these theories and judicial application results differs a lot. According to the comparison and analysis,the limited affirmation is more scientific and reasonable since it implements both the causal accomplice theory and the principle of personal responsibility in criminal law.

关 键 词：承继共同正犯 限定肯定说 因果共犯论 刑事责任 个人责任原则 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]