检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学法学院
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第4期103-110,共8页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基 金:司法部部级研究课题(07SFB2034)
摘 要:林权并非是我国《物权法》、《森林法》上明确规定的权利类型,而立法论上学界对林权的界定和内容的建构争议很大,其原因在于学者对林权客体的确定标准不统一。根据我国现行立法有关森林归属和利用的民事权利规定,结合森林的自然资源特性,应将森林及其所生长范围内的林地确定为林权的法律客体。The jurisprudent interpretations on the conception and content diverge dramatically on account of the statutory loophole that"forest tenure"has never been literally stipulated as a legitimately typified real right in neither"Real Right Law"nor "Forestry Law".This deviation in hermeneutics,manifested by diverse definitions on the objection of forest tenure,has been attributed to the inconformity in setting criteria for the objection.Presuming forest tenure as a real right,this thesis strived to clarify the objection of forest tenure according to the characteristics of forests and also the specialty principle of real right in the background of public ownership on forest in Chinese legal system and attempted to conclude that the composite objection,forest and forestry land,of forest tenure would satisfy the distinctive value of forest while separating the attached realty from land.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.186.117