检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室,上海200092 [2]芜湖华衍水务有限公司,安徽芜湖241001
出 处:《中国给水排水》2015年第21期118-123,共6页China Water & Wastewater
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX07403-001;2012ZX07403-002;2008ZX07421-002);高校博士点基金资助项目(20120072110050);国家自然科学基金资助项目(51178321);住房和城乡建设部研究开发项目(2009-K7-4)
摘 要:针对常规工艺在给水处理中的局限性,为进一步优化出水水质,对比研究了预氯化与高锰酸钾预氧化对长江芜湖段水源水的强化混凝效果,分别考察了两种不同预氧化技术对去除浊度、CODMn、UV254、NH3-N、亚硝酸盐氮和三卤甲烷生成势(THMFP)的影响。结果表明:预氯化处理效果总体上优于高锰酸钾预氧化效果,但预氯化对于三卤甲烷生成势的控制以及助凝作用不及高锰酸钾预氧化。综合考虑除污效果及经济性,选取预氯化最佳工况为0.4 mg/L次氯酸钠预氧化60 min,高锰酸钾预氧化最佳工况为:高锰酸钾投量为0.4 mg/L、与混凝剂同时投加,并以预氯化为优选方案。In view of the limitations of conventional process in treatment of drinking water, to fur- ther optimize the water quality, a comparative study on the effect of prechlorination and potassium permanganate preoxidation on enhanced coagulation of source water from Wuhu section of Yangtze River was carried out. The influence of the two different pretreatment techniques on removal of turbitidy, CODMn, UV254, NH3 -N, nitrite and trihalomethane formation potential (THMFP) was investigated respectively. The results showed that the treatment efficiency of prechlorination was generally superior to that of potassium permanganate preoxidation, but inferior to it in THMFP control and eoagulantion enhancement. Considering the removal effciency of above indicators and economical efficiency, 60 rain of sodium hypochlorite oxidation with NaC10 concenration of 0.4 mg/L and 0 min of potassium permanganate preoxidation with KMnO4 concenration of 0.4 mg/L were chosen as the best conditions of preehlorination and potassium permanganate preoxidation respectively, and the former scheme was considered as the optimum.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7