检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学财务与会计学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]郑州航空工业管理学院会计学院,河南郑州450015 [3]南京审计学院国际审计学院,江苏南京211815
出 处:《管理工程学报》2015年第4期76-86,共11页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:教育部人文社科资助项目(10YJC790148)
摘 要:超过120个国家要求上市公司采用国际会计准则(IFRS),然而对强制采用IFRS所带来的信息环境改善的实证研究结果往往是相互矛盾的,并且没有分离出强制采用IFRS所带来的信息可比性和信息质量效应的影响作用。本文通过研究强制采用IFRS对信息环境的影响,发现分析师对强制采用IFRS的公司的预测准确性高于其它类型的公司。通过控制相关的影响因素,对具体公司层面的预测数据进行分析,本文发现信息环境的改善与信息可比性和信息质量的提高相关。本研究表明强制采用IFRS提高了信息的可比性和信息质量,从而改善了资本市场中的会计信息的媒介作用和其信息环境。More than 120 countries require that publicly listed companies adopt the International Financial Reporting Standards(IFRS). However, the empirical evidence about IFRS' presumed benefits are often conflicting and fail to distinguish between information quality and comparability. In this paper, the study examines the effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on firms' information environment. This study finds that after mandatory IFRS policy is adopted, more consensus forecast errors are decreased for firms that mandatorily adopt IFRS than for forecast errors of firms that do not mandatorily adopt IFRS. This study also holds constant for any information effect of IFRS adoption and finds that the increase in forecast accuracy is partly driven by comparability benefits. This study establishes this result by analyzing three groups of analysts. First, this paper studies the group of analysts who help companies report under a single local GAAP before mandatory adoption. After mandatory adoption is implemented, some firms switch to IFRS while other firms continue to report under local GAAP. For these analysts, the study expects the accounting comparability to decrease. Second, this paper studies another group of analysts who helped firms report under a single local GAAP before mandatory adoption and after mandatory adoption. All firms responsible by the group of analysts switched to IFRS. For these analysts, the study expects the accounting comparability to remain the same. Third, this study examines another group of analysts who helped firms report under multiple local GAAPs before mandatory adoption, but after mandatory adoption all firms switch to IFRS. For these analysts, the study expects accounting comparability to increase. If information effects exist for mandatory adopters, all three groups of analysts are going to be benefited. To eliminate the possibility that an analyst's choice to change firm coverage could affect the results, this study includes only mandatory adopters. Consistent with the presence of a c
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.155