学术期刊主要评价体系差异性研究——以SCI收录材料学期刊为例  

A Study on the Difference of the Academic Journal Evaluation System——Taking Materials Science Journals Included by SCI as an Example

作　　者：朱沙[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北三峡职业技术学院图书馆

出　　处：《高校图书情报论坛》2015年第3期53-58,60,共7页ACADEMIC LIBRARY AND INFORMATION TRIBUNE

摘　　要：当前对学术期刊的定量评价,普遍采用文献量、被引频次、影响因子等文献计量指标。但因各学科自身特性及发展状况的差异,期刊自身稿源质量、办刊风格等不同,期刊评价工作在一定程度上存在评价体系不完善、评价方法不规范等问题。利用JCR Web、中科院JCR分区表、SCImago网站,从多个角度深入分析SCI收录的材料学期刊评价标准之间的差异性,探讨如何综合利用JCR的各项指标对不同学科的学术期刊进行正确评价。The quantitative evaluation of the academic journals generally uses articles,total cites,and impact factor. But because of the differences on the characteristics and development status of the research fields,some problems exist in the journal evaluation. This paper,using JCR Web、Chinese academy of sciences JCR partition table and SCImago website analyses the materials science journals,discussing how to correctly evaluate the academic journals by JCR evaluation index.

关 键 词：期刊评价体系 差异比较 材料学科 

分 类 号：G251.5[文化科学—图书馆学]