检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中农业大学园艺林学院 [2]武汉市园林科学研究所 [3]华中农业大学园艺林学学院
出 处:《中国园林》2015年第10期96-99,共4页Chinese Landscape Architecture
基 金:武汉市园林局项目"武汉市高架桥庇阴绿地新优景观植物应用研究"[编号武园(2011)67号]资助
摘 要:对长江流域地区武汉、上海、重庆3座城市中心城区的145座高架桥绿化现状进行了调查,对比三市高架桥绿化比率、植物群落结构、植物配置特点及设计特色。三市高架桥绿化比率武汉最低,为63.6%;上海最高,达到了90.9%。应用的植物共106种,隶属48科84属;植物群落灌—草最多,其次是乔—灌—草;在桥墩绿化、改善植物生境措施、配套基础设施方面各城市采用了一些特色设计,既实用又美观。通过对三市高架桥绿化的比较,为研究长江流域地区的城市高架桥绿化提供了依据和思路。The greening situation of 145 viaducts situated in the Yangtze River region namely Wuhan, Shanghai, Chongqing were surveyed, including comparison of viaduct greening rate, plant community structure, plant arrangement and design features. Viaduct greening rate in Wuhan was the lowest, 63.6%; Shanghai got the highest, reaching 90.9%. Greening plants in three cities contained 106 species belonging to 48 families, 84 genera. Plant communities were mostly shrub-grass, followed by arbor-shrub-grass. There were some distinctive designs about pier greening, plant habitat improvement and supporting infrastructure in each city, which brought practical and aesthetic effects. By comparing viaduct greening in three cities, it provides the basis and idea for studying viaduct greening in the same climate type along the Yangtze River.
关 键 词:风景园林 城区高架桥 绿化植物 上海 重庆 武汉
分 类 号:TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.124.105