论英国个人隐私权利保护的法律制度构建——以英国《人权法》颁行后保密责任构成要件的再解读为视角  

The Constructionofthe Legal Systemto Protectthe Rightof Privacyin UK——The Re-interpretation of the Elements of Confidentiality Liability After the British“Human Rights Law” Publishment

作　　者：阚在斌 

机构地区：[1]青海民族大学,青海西宁810007

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2015年第3期71-77,共7页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

摘　　要：在英国通过《人权法》法案前,新闻自由未被视为一项法定权利,但民众早已形成一种共识,新闻自由理当在社会中得到保障。而隐私权作为自然人权,具有普世价值,大众也应享有"对自己隐私合理期待"的权利。媒体为迎合大众的低俗口味,把闲话转为商品,其触角甚至伸向受害者。由于隐私权法的缺位,公民的隐私始终处于风雨飘摇中,民众只得依据其他诉因寻求法律上的救济。《人权法》颁布后,法官在实践中对保密责任新标准重新解读,这种变化对后续的判例产生了深远影响。Before＆lt;Human Rights Act 1998＆gt; was published in the parliament, pressfreedom had not been a statutory right. But the general public have got a common sense that this right should be feasibly ensured especially in contemporary society. The privacy, as a natural right, has a significant value, and even public figure have same rights to be alone and to life. The press recklessly reported all kinds of matters in order to cater to public’s vulgar interests ,turning gossip into products, even the victims and the public are included. Owing to defecting of ＆lt;Privacy Act＆gt; in England, the legal protection about personal privacy also lack of effective protection which lead this right to be in a precarious condition. The public have to rely on other courses of action to maintain their rights instead of infringing upon the rights of privacy. After ＆lt;Human Rights Act 1998＆gt;was published, Judges have a new opinion about the new criterion of secrecy responsibility in the suits ,and this great changes produced significant effects on following judicial judgments.

关 键 词：新闻自由 侵权行为 个人隐私权 诉因制度 违反保密责任 

分 类 号：D922.7[政治法律—法学]