检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘莉新[1]
机构地区:[1]新疆师范大学体育学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830053
出 处:《新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2015年第3期82-86,共5页Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Natural Sciences Edition)
基 金:自治区普通高校人文社科重点研究基地--新疆民族体育文化研究中心
摘 要:文章主要通过文献资料法和逻辑分析法对跆拳道品势与武术套路的基本概况、技战术特点、价值取向和礼仪、礼节、形体塑造等方面进行对比研究,找出二者之间的异同点,并对其各自特征进行比较分析。二者发展至今,在历史长河的发展过程中,武术的发展整体上要优于跆拳道的发展。而今,跆拳道在世界的推广程度却优于武术,总结现代跆拳道快速发展的因素带给武术发展的启示和思考。In this paper, a comparative study is made on Martial Arts Routines and TaekwondoPoomsae, con-cerning their general development, technical and tactic features, value implications, rituals, body building etc.. The research is intended to find their differences and similarities, on which an analytical work is made.The re-search methods adopted in the paper are documentary analysis and logical analysis.The discovery made in this pa-per is that Martial Arts enjoys a better development than Taekwondo does from historical perspective, yet Taekwon-do is far ahead of Martial Arts in terms of global promotion.The reasons behind the rapid global promotion of Taek-wondo bring some inspiring implications to the further development of Martial Arts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3