GSS治疗腰椎滑脱的植骨融合率及疗效分析  

GSS for the treatment of lumbar spine bone graft fusion rate and curative effect analysis

作　　者：曾巧[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州市番禺区中医院骨科,广东广州511400

出　　处：《中国医药科学》2015年第18期182-184,共3页China Medicine And Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的研究GSS治疗腰椎滑脱的植骨融合率及疗效。方法选择2012年2月~2014年7月我院的104例腰椎滑脱患者实施研究。以数字法随机分成观察组（52例）和对照组（52例）。其中观察组患者采用GSS内固定联合植骨融合治疗,而对照组单纯进行植骨融合治疗。对比两组疗效以及出血量以及出血时长。结果观察组疗效为优者占比,优良率占比,均显著高于对照组。观察组出血量,平均手术时长,均显著少于对照组。术前观察组与对照组在椎间隙高度上比较无显著差异,术后观察组在椎间隙高度的维持上好于对照组。观察组植骨融合率显著高于对照组。差异均有统计学意义（均P〈0.05）。结论 GSS内固定联合植骨融合不仅可明显提升治疗效果,还可减少术中出血量以及手术时间,提高融合率。安全性较好,值得临床推荐。Objective To study the GSS for the treatment of lumbar spine bone graft fusion rate and curative effect. Methods 104 patients with lumbar olisthe in our hospital from February 2012 to July 2012 were selected. In digital method randomly divided into observation group（52 cases） and control group（52 cases）. The observation group was treated by GSS internal fixation with bone graft fusion therapy, while the control group was pure treatment with bone graft fusion. Comparing two groups of curative effect and the bleeding and bleeding time. Results The observation group＇s curative effect for instituting proportion was accounted significantly higher than the control group. Observation group＇s blood loss, and the average operation time, was significantly less than the control group. Preoperative observation group and control group was no significant difference in the intervertebral disc height, postoperative observation group in maintenance of intervertebral disc height was superior to the control group. Observation group of bone graft fusion rate was significantly higher than the control group. Were statistically significant differences（all P〈0.05）. Conclusion The combined bone graft fusion GSS internal fixation not only can obviously improve curative effect, still can reduce intraoperative blood loss and operation time, improve the convergence rate. Security is good, it is worth clinical recommendations.

关 键 词：通用型脊柱内固定系统 植骨融合 腰椎滑脱 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]