检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《证券市场导报》2015年第10期4-12,共9页Securities Market Herald
摘 要:VIE模式作为中概股登陆海外资本市场的主要方式,产生的主要原因是国内股票发行与海外直接上市的高门槛。VIE模式帮助大量中国高科技企业在发展关口融得资金,但由于该模式主要是通过协议而非传统的股权来实现对境内企业的控制,使其成为上市模式的另类。本文通过大量的案例分析,指出VIE模式所独具的双重道德风险。鉴于VIE模式尚且存在一定的现实需要,本文指出在监管模式上,证监会应一方面加大披露力度,让外国投资者切实了解到VIE模式的风险,另一方面拓宽境内境外的融资渠道,让VIE模式真正成为一个历史称谓。VIE structure, which is the main way that Chinese enterprises adopt to be listed in overseas financial markets, is rooted in the high thresholds both for IPO at home and for listing directly overseas. The VIE structure makes it possible for many Chinese enterprises to raise funds, but because in this way the listed companies controls the enterprises at home through contracts, which should be equity in traditional way, the structure becomes special. This article systemically analyzes the risks of VIE structure through the recent cases and proposes that the moral hazard is doubled in the structure. In final, the article points out that the double moral hazards problem could not be solved by the methods put forward by foreign investment laws. Under such circumstances, CRSC, working together with SEC, should strengthen the disclosure of the risks of the VIE. In the meanwhile, the regulators should make it more convenient for enterprises to finance no matter at home or overseas so that the VIE structure will be not preferred d in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222