审判阶段受贿案非法言词证据排除实效研究——缺陷、成因与规范化  

An Empirical Study on the Implement of the Exclusinary Rules of Illegally Obtained Verbal Evidence in Bribery Cases at Trial Stage:Defects,Contributing Factors and Standardization

作　　者：黄健[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第6期89-96,共8页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：就证据种类而言,非法言词证据适用绝对排除规则;就排除阶段而言,《刑事诉讼法》对审判阶段排除非法证据的程序规定最为详细。受贿证据以被告人供述、行贿人证言这两种言词证据为主,且辩方更倾向于在审判阶段申请排除非法证据。因此,通过受贿案非法言词证据在审判阶段排除的实证研究,可以分析我国最明确、详细的非法证据排除规则及程序设计的运行实效,并发现实践中的规律与缺陷。现阶段,即使是最为详尽的排除规则,在实际运用中仍缺乏指导性。通过规范化程序设计可以为非法证据排除提供指引并限制裁判机关的自由裁量,矫正缺陷。For the kinds of evidence,illegally obtained verbal evidence should be absolutely expelled.For stages,the exclusion procedure in trail stage is legislated most detailed in Criminal Proceduer Law.The confession and exculpation of the defendant and testimony of the briber are the primary evidences in bribery cases.What is more,the defence tend to apply for exclusion procedure at the trial stages.So making an empirical study on the exclusinary rules of illegally obtained verbal evidence in bribery cases at trial stage,we can analyze the implement of the most obvious exclusion rules in our country and find out the defects in them.At the present stage,the most clear exclusion rules also lack guiding effects.In order to correct the defect,standardized procedure should be legislated to guide and limite the discretion of judging organs.

关 键 词：受贿案 非法言词证据排除 缺陷 成因 规范化 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学]