检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯凤坤[1]
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院
出 处:《知识产权》2015年第10期84-88,共5页Intellectual Property
摘 要:为应对实践中商标权人维权成本高、得不偿失的现象,新《商标法》引入了惩罚性赔偿制度,此举被多数学者看作是打击商标侵权的"重磅武器",具有威慑和惩罚侵权人、遏制商标侵权现象、有效保护商标权人的功能。本文基于我国商标保护现状,从多个视角对商标法中惩罚性赔偿制度的相关内容进行研究,探析其制度缺陷,并提出相应的完善建议。In respond to the phenomenon of unreasonable high costs trademark owners pay while executing their legal rights, the new trademark law has introduced a punitive compensation system. It is regarded by most scholars as an effective way to crack down on trademark infringement, which deters and punishes the infringer, curbs the trademark infringement, and effectively protects trademark holders. Based on the status quo of trademark protection in China, I studied related contents of punitive damages system in trademark law from multiple perspectives, analyzed the defects of the system in the new trademark law, and put forward the corresponding perfection measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15