“名田”与“授田”辨正——秦和西汉前期土地制度性质析疑  

An Analysis of the Nature of Land System in Qin and Early Western Han Dynasties

作　　者：臧知非[1] 霍耀宗[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学社会学院,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《史学集刊》2015年第6期40-50,共11页Collected Papers of History Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"简牍与秦汉赋役研究"(08BZS005)成果之一

摘　　要：把"名田"解为"以名占田",虽有其合理性,但是,用"名田制"概括秦汉土地制度,或者以名田代替授田,在训诂和史实上都有不足,不能反映国家分配土地的历史实质。"名田宅臣妾衣服以家次"明确了国家按照名籍、家次分配田宅、臣妾、衣服,其法律用语则是"行田"、"予田宇"、"受田",编户民田宅是被动地向国家领取,名之为授田制才能反映国家力量在土地分配中的主导地位和编户民隶属于国家的历史属性,才能体现国家控制人口、土地的本质特征。It＇s somewhat reasonable to understand Mingtian （ 名田 ） as holding land by name, however, it＇s insufficient from perspective of both classical exegesis and historical facts to summarize the land system of Qin and Han Dynasties as Mingtian system, or to replace granting land with Mingtian which is unable to reflect the historical essence of land distribution. Land, house, servants and clothes were allocated according to roster and the degree of rank of nobility. Only granting land system can reflect the predominant position of national power in distribution of land and the substantive characteristics of control of population and land by central government.

关 键 词：名田宅 授田 行田 限民名田 

分 类 号：F301.1[经济管理—产业经济] K232[历史地理—历史学]