“乙全本”不是“李汪宪草”  

The Complete Version B(乙全本) Wasn't the Draft Constitution by Li and Wang(李汪宪草)

作　　者：彭剑[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学中国近代史研究所,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《史学集刊》2015年第6期68-79,共12页Collected Papers of History Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"清季官方起草宪法研究"(12CZS032)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：迟云飞在《清末预备立宪》研究中提出,资政院全宗中保存的"乙全本"就是清末制订的完整宪法草案"李汪宪草"。然而在《历史研究》发表的俞江的论文早已指出,两者不是同一文件。尚有种种证据表明,乙全本确实不是李汪宪草。即使迟云飞判定乙全本是李汪宪草的"最重要的"证据,也并不可靠,相反,可以说明乙全本与李汪宪草在体例上不同,足证两者不是同一文件。从已有研究辨认出的关于李汪宪草的一些要素,可以作为今后进一步寻找这一文献时的参考。In A Study on the Preparations for Constitutionalism in Late that the complete version B （乙全本） is the Draft Constitution by Li Qing, Chi Yunfei （迟云飞） argued and Wang （李汪宪草）. However, Yu Jiang （俞） had pointed out that they were different document. Many evidences indicated that the complete version B is not the Draft Constitution by Li and Wang. ＂The most important＂ evidence of Chi＇s is not reliable either. On the contrary, one can find that the style of the two draft constitution were different, which demonstrates they were not the same document. Some elements of the Draft Constitution by Li and Wang will be helpful for scholars to explore the issue of version of the two constitutions it in the future.

关 键 词：乙全本 李汪宪草 汪荣宝日记 预备立宪 制宪 

分 类 号：K257.5[历史地理—历史学]