检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南工业大学管理科学与工程研究所,湖南株洲412007
出 处:《系统工程学报》2015年第5期682-692,共11页Journal of Systems Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71201053);湖南工业大学研究生创新基金资助项目(CX1417)
摘 要:针对旅行社易对单一导游服务供应商产生依赖及导游服务质量低下等问题,以旅行社将导游服务业务发包给两个具有竞争关系的导游服务供应商为前提,运用委托代理理论分别设计了有无奖惩机制两种情况下的导游服务外包契约,并比较分析了两种契约下的最优激励参数.研究发现在线性分成机制基础上增设奖惩机制,可有效提升导游服务外包系统产出并缓解导游服务质量及游客满意度低下等问题,线性分成机制与奖惩机制之间在激励效能上具有互补性.最后,通过数值仿真分析了基于竞争关系及奖惩机制下导游服务外包激励契约的有效性.Considering the travel agencies' problem of relying on the single supplier providing with tourguide service as well as the guides' problem of low-quality service, with the assume of that the travel agencies award contract to two tour-guide service suppliers with competitive relationship as the prerequisite, based on the principal-agent theory, tour-guide service outsourcing incentive contracts with and without reward penalty mechanism are designed respectively, and the optimal incentive parameters under two kinds of contract are analyzed. Researches show that adding reward penalty mechanism on the basis of linear sharing mechanism can enhance system output of tour-guide service outsourcing and alleviate the problem of low-quality guiders' serves and tourists' satisfaction, and that the reward penalty mechanism and linear sharing mechanism are complementary in motivation effectiveness. Finally, a numerical example is used to confirm the effectiveness of the incentive contracts of tour-guide service outsourcing, based on the competitive relationship and reward penalty mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222