出 处:《实用肝脏病杂志》2015年第6期616-619,共4页Journal of Practical Hepatology
摘 要:目的观察恩替卡韦联合扶正化瘀胶囊治疗活动性肝硬化患者的疗效。方法 60例活动性乙型肝炎肝硬化患者被随机分为观察组30例和对照组30例,两组均给予常规治疗。给予对照组患者恩替卡韦片治疗24 w,给予观察组患者恩替卡韦联合扶正化瘀胶囊治疗,观察并比较两组血清肝纤维化指标和肝功能变化。结果治疗前对照组患者血清透明质酸为(320.4±196)ng/ml,层黏连蛋白为(180.9±80)ng/ml,Ⅲ型前胶胶原为(261.2±132)ng/ml、Ⅳ型胶原为(204.1±78.1)ng/m,谷丙转氨酶为(169.87±13.32)U/L、白蛋白为(34.05±6.94)U/L、总胆红素为(48.89±11.03)μmol/L,门静脉直径为(12.9±1.1)mm,脾脏长度为(12.9±1.1)mm、脾脏厚度为(48.6±4.7)mm,观察组透明质酸为(334.7±119.8)ng/ml,层黏连蛋白为(183.2±79.6)ng/ml,Ⅲ型前胶胶原为(252.5±139.8)ng/ml、Ⅳ型胶原为(203.3±74.1)ng/m,谷丙转氨酶为(171.53±11.21)U/L、白蛋白为(33.46±7.53)U/L、总胆红素为(49.33±10.1)μmol/L,门静脉直径为(13.1±0.7)mm,脾脏长度为(122.1±3.9)mm、脾脏厚度为(48.9±4.2)mm,两组无显著性统计学差异;治疗后,对照组透明质酸为(205.2±49.6)ng/ml,层黏连蛋白为(149.8±64.3)ng/ml,Ⅲ型前胶胶原为(192.7±99.8)ng/ml、Ⅳ型胶原为(159.2±42.5)ng/m,谷丙转氨酶为(54.89±6.65)U/L、白蛋白为(35.59±7.2)U/L、总胆红素为(20.89±9.65)μmol/L,门静脉直径为(11.7±0.85)mm,脾脏长度为(117.3±2.9)mm、脾脏厚度为(46.8±3.6)mm,观察组透明质酸为(158.2±79.1)ng/ml,层黏连蛋白为(104.3±59.7)ng/ml,Ⅲ型前胶胶原为(140.2±76.4)ng/ml、Ⅳ型胶原为(111.4±56.8)ng/m,谷丙转氨酶为(24.37±7.33)U/L、白蛋白为(41.02±6.3)U/L、总胆红素为(10.32±8.03)μmol/L,门静脉直径为(10.2±0.5)mm,脾脏长度为(109.4±3.1)mm、脾脏厚度为(44.4±2.0)mm,两组间具有显著性统计学差异(P<0.05);治疗48结束时,观察组患者血清HBV DNA阴转率为83.3%,明显高于对照组治疗后的40%(P<0.05)。结论恩替卡�Objective To explore the therapeutic efficacy of entecavir combined with Fuzhenghuayu capsules in the treatment of patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis. Methods 60 patients with active hepatitis B related cirrhosis were randomly divided into observation group (n=30) and control group (n=30). At the base of conventional therapy,patients in control group was given only entecavir,while in observation group was given entecavir combined with Fuzhenghuayu capsules,and both for 24 weeks. Serum indicators of hepatic fibrosis and liver function were recorded and analyzed. Results Serum hyaluronic acid (HA),laminin (LN),procollagen type III( PC Ill, collagen- 1V ( IV-C ), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TBIL), portal vein' s diameter,spleen length and spleen thickness in observation group and control group before the treatment had no significant differences [HA(334.7±119,8) ng/ml vs. (320.4±196) ng/ml;LN (183.2±79.6) ng/ml vs. (180.9±80) ng/ml;PC 11[(252.5±139.8) ng/ml vs. (261.2±132) ng/ml;IV-C (203.3±74.1) ng/ml vs. (204.1±78.1) ng/ml;ALT (171.53±11,21) U/L vs. (169.87±13.32) U/L;ALB (33.46±7.53) g/L vs. (34.05±6.94) g/L;TBIL (49.33±10.1) μmol/L vs.(48.89±11.03)μmol/L;portal vein's diameter (13.1±0.7) mm vs. (12.9±1.1) mm;spleen's length ( 122.1 ±3.9 ) mm vs. ( 123.4±2.5 ) mm ; spleen' s thickness (48.9±4.2) mm vs. (48.6±4.7) mm; P〉0.05 for all] ; After the treatment,the above-mentioned indicators in the two groups were statistically different [HA (158.2±79.1) ng/ml vs. (205.2±49.6) ng/ml;LN (104.3±59.7) ng/ml vs. (149.8±64.3) ng/ml;PC III (140.2±76.4) ng/ml vs. (192.7± 99.8) ng/ml;IV-C (111.4±56.8) ng/ml vs.(159.2±42.5) ng/ml;ALT(24.37±7.33) U/L vs. (54.89±6.65) U/L;ALB(41.02±6.3 ) g/L vs. (35.59±7.2) g/L; TBIL ( 10.32±8.03 ) μmol/L vs. ( 20.89±9.65 ) μmol/L; portal vein' s
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...