区分预约与本约物债两分释解缔约责任之困境——对《矿产资源法》第六条适用的法理诠释  

Marking off Pre-Contract and Real Contract of the Dual Structure of Real Rights and Creditor's Rights and Interpreting Contracting Liability——Interpretation of the Provisions of Section 6 of “Mineral Resource Law”

作　　者：张文可[1] 李显冬[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京100088

出　　处：《中国国土资源经济》2015年第9期4-10,共7页Natural Resource Economics of China

摘　　要：针对"合同成立但未生效"引起纠纷的解决,主要有两种法律解决路径即"缔约责任违约化"与"预约合同"制度。文章客观地介绍了相关制度的内涵、背景、功能及其适用规则,释明现有法律制度的缺陷,理顺我国法律体系因此产生的争议,进而寻求司法实务中疑难案件的解决路径。鉴于"缔约合同违约化"处理方案在法理层面的突出问题以及与现行法律体系的明显冲突,应予以排除,转而选择优势明显的"预约合同"制度。将预约合同制度应用于矿业权的转让过程中,如果法律释明预约合同效力采"必须缔约说",那么涉矿转让合同可视为预约合同,而"依法批准后的"合同内容视为"本合同",则实践中因矿业权的流转产生的纠纷也就不再是难题。The systems of ＂breach of contracting liability＂ and ＂pre-contract＂ are the two major legal resolutions to the dispute arising from ＂a contract has not been taken effect after its formation＂. This paper objectively introduces the connotation, background, function, and applicable rules with regard to relevant legal system. On this basis, it is also interpreted existing defi ciency of the legal system and in an effort to straighten out the dispute over the poor legal system with the purposes of seeking the solutions to diffi cult cases in judicial practice. In light of the legal serious problems that we face in handling ＂Breach of Signing Contract＂, as well as the obvious confl ict with the current legal system; we should remove it, and turn over to choose the superiority obvious of ＂Pre-contract System＂. This paper suggests that the ＂Pre-contract System＂ should be used in the process of the transfer of mining right. Specifi cally, it means that if ＂must sign＂ is used for legal interpretation of pre-contract effectiveness, the transfer contract concerning the mineral is deemed as pre-contract. And the contract contents after approval in accordance with the law is deemed as ＂this contract＂. By doing this, in practice, the dispute arising from exchange of mining rights is no longer a problem.

关 键 词：批准生效 成立未生效 预约合同 缔约责任违约化 

分 类 号：F407.1[经济管理—产业经济]