“胡风派”与《文艺月报》的前前后后  

The Whole Story of “Hu Feng Faction”and Monthly Review of Literature and Art

作　　者：张均[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学中文系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《海南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第9期1-8,共8页Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"十七年文学杂志与文学生产"(批准号:10YJC751118)

摘　　要：华东文联机关刊物《文艺月报》编委会主要由前新四军文人和前"鲁迅弟子"构成。这为它奠定了良好开局:对艺术独立于政治的共识,以及对"普及"文艺的隐蔽疏离,使《文艺月报》以迂回策略而成为"新的人民的文艺"中同人色彩强烈的另类刊物。然而,创刊伊始就存在的门户之争,因耿庸《阿Q正传研究》而在编辑部公开爆发,最终上海"胡风派"失去对此刊物的编辑权与影响力。"胡风派"与《文艺月报》的始终,也是建国后文艺报刊从流派主义转向派系主义、知识分子利用政治并附从政治的有效"生态样本"。The editorial committee for Monthly Review of Literature and Art —an official journal of the literary federation in Eastern China—is composed of former scholars from the New Fourth Army and former＂Lu Xun followers＂,which has laid a good start for it,for the consensus of art being independent of politics and the covert alienation of＂popularized＂ literature and art have enabled the journal to develop in an indirect approach into a distinctive special one among ＂new magazines of literature and art for the people＂. Nevertheless,the sectarian dispute at the start publication of the journal broke out in the editorial committee for Geng Yong＇s On The True Story of Ah Q,thereby leading to the ultimate loss of ＂Hu Feng Faction＇s control over the editing power and influence of the journal. The entire relationship between ＂Writers of Hu Feng Faction＂and Monthly Review of Literature and Art is also the effective ＂eco-sample＂of the change from literary school diversification to factionalism on the part of literary and artistic newspapers and periodicals as well as of intellectuals＇ utilization of and attachment to politics after the founding of New China.

关 键 词：《文艺月报》 胡风派 迂回策略 派系主义 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]