论我国机动车所有权变动模式之挑战——兼谈《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第10条的影响  

On the Challenge from Transfer Mode of Motor Vehicle Ownership in China: Along with the Influence of Article 10 in Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Concerning the Application of Law for the Trial of Cases of Disputes over Sales Contra

作　　者：马海蓉[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学法学院,上海200083

出　　处：《海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2015年第5期105-109,共5页Journal of Hainan University （Humanities & Social Sciences）

基　　金：上海外国语大学2013年度校级一般科研项目(KX171305)

摘　　要：我国《物权法》第23条、第24条规定了机动车所有权变动模式为交付加登记对抗主义,但该模式在理论及实践上都存在一定的问题。2012年7月1日起实施的《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第10条的规定对此进行了变革,将交付加登记对抗主义转变为交付生效模式,直接挑战了物权法的相关规定。Articles 23 and 24 of The Property Law of the People＇s Republic of China stipulate that the transfer mode of motor vehicle ownership shall be the delivery of doctrine and registration antagonism simultaneously,which,however,has the certain flaws in both theory and practice. Article 10 in Interpretation of the Supreme People＇s Court on Issues Concerning the Application of Law for the Trial of Cases of Disputes over Sales Contracts that has been enacted since July 1,2012 makes some alternations towards this mode,transforming the mode of delivery of doctrine and registration antagonism into that of delivery of doctrine with validity,which directly challenges the relevant provisions of The Property Law of the People＇s Republic of China

关 键 词：机动车所有权变动模式 交付加登记对抗主义 交付生效主义 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]