检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马慧[1] 李秀影 高红新[1] 闫五一 邵中玲 张传友 景赟 宋之杰[5]
机构地区:[1]燕山大学文法学院 [2]大连93253部队卫生队 [3]秦皇岛市中级人民法院 [4]秦皇岛市北戴河新区人民法院 [5]燕山大学经济管理学院
出 处:《现代预防医学》2015年第21期3855-3859,共5页Modern Preventive Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71171175);河北省自然科学基金面上项目(G2015203330);河北省社会科学基金年度项目(HB14JY003);燕山大学博士基金项目(B901)
摘 要:目的调查我国法官心理健康现状,并通过元分析了解我国法官心理健康全貌。方法采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)对226名法官进行调查,并与律师和公务员进行对比;搜集国内以SCL-90为调查工具、以法官为对象的研究报道,与本研究结果一起进行元分析。结果被试法官心理健康状况低于全国常模水平,与公务员差异不显著,在躯体化方面低于律师;不同工作年限法官在躯体化、强迫症状、焦虑和"其他"方面存在显著差异。元分析纳入文献共6篇,涉及被试1 064人,元分析结果显示,我国法官整体心理健康各方面与一般人群差异不显著;经同质性和敏感性分析,剔除一篇文献后,法官在躯体化、强迫症状、抑郁、焦虑和精神病性方面的状况明显低于一般人群。结论我国法官整体心理健康状况不佳;由于纳入文献较少、异质性明显,应用此结果需谨慎。Objective To study the overall mental health status of Chinese judges by investigating the mental health levels of Chinese judges and doing meta-analysis. Methods Symptom Checklist(SCL-90) was used to investigate the mental health status of judges in Hebei Province, which was compared with that of lawyers or civil servants from the same area. Software Review Manager Version 5.1 was applied to do meta-analysis of studies on mental health of Chinese judges by using SCL-90, together with the results of this study. Results The judges had significant higher scores on all the nine factors of SCL-90 than the norm(P〈0.05), and had significant higher score on somatization than the lawyers(P〈0.001). There was no significant difference in all the nine factors compared to the civil servants(all P〈0.05). Finally, six studies including 1064 participants were included. There was overall heterogeneity across these six studies(all P〈0.05, I250%), so random-effects model was used. Meta-analysis found that the overall effect size of Chinese judges showed no significant difference in mental health level compared with the norm(all P〈0.05). One paper was excluded because it caused the overall heterogeneity and sensibility. Then meta-analysis of the remaining 5 studies showed the mental health levels of Chinese judges were inferior to Chinese general levels in somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depression,anxiety, and psychoticism(all P≤0.01). Conclusion The overall mental health status of Chinese judges is poor. Considering few included studies and high heterogeneity, the application of these findings should be careful.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229