论专利法中法定赔偿制度的终结  

On the Abolishment of the Statutory Damages in China's Patent Law

作　　者：李小武[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院知识产权研究中心

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2015年第10期46-59,共14页Electronics Intellectual Property

摘　　要：中国专利侵权救济中的法定赔偿制度不是国际条约的强制要求,不能解决中国损害赔偿计算中的实际问题,而且掩盖了中国当今司法实践中的损害赔偿举证困难和程序规则不利于两造配合举证的问题,导致法庭合法地规避实际的损害赔偿计算。对比美国和德国,没有法定赔偿制度,其专利侵权损害救济同样完善。考察版权法或者商标法里的法定赔偿,并不能推导出专利法中法定赔偿制度的合理性。专利权人直接寻求法定赔偿的普遍性也不能说明法定赔偿的正当性。法定赔偿制度是对于以实际损害为基础的专利损害赔偿制度的破坏,因而,专利法领域的法定赔偿制度实无必要。This article argues that the statutory damages in the remedies for the patent infringement should be abolished once for all. The statutory damages for the patent infringement is not an mandatory obligation for the member state of the Trips. It didn＇t help to solve the real problems in the calculation of the damages in China, rather it leads to the legitimate aversion of the calculation of the actual losses of the right holder, by concealing the real issues in current judicial practice such as the difficulty of proving the damages, and the lack of encouragement in the rule of procedure for both parties in the litigation to provide proof for the calculation. By comparesion, the developed countries such as United States and Germany have no statutory damages in their patent laws, but their remedy systems function quite well. Also, the existence of the statutory damages in the copyright law and the trademark law is not a justification for the legitimacy of the statutory damages in the patent law, either is the frequent use of the calculating method of Oae statutory damages pursued the patent holder in the patent infringement ease. The statutory damages is a disaster for the patent remedy system which is founded on the basis of the actual loss of the patent holder. In conclusion, the statutory damages in the patent law is unnecessary and should be abolished.

关 键 词：损害赔偿 法定赔偿 计算方法 实际损害 侵权人的获益 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]