检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张振[1] 龚国芳[1] 吴伟强[1] 刘统[1] 饶云意[1] 周建军[2]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学流体动力与机电系统国家重点实验室,浙江杭州310027 [2]中铁隧道集团盾构及掘进技术国家重点实验室,河南郑州450003
出 处:《浙江大学学报(工学版)》2015年第10期1870-1877,共8页Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
基 金:国家"863"高技术研究发展计划资助项目(2012AA041803);国家"973"重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(2013CB035400)
摘 要:针对全断面硬岩隧道掘进机(TBM)油缸并联推进系统产生的推进干扰力降低关键部件使用寿命和隧道开挖精度的问题,提出姿态自适应推进系统.建立推进机构的数学模型,将推进油缸分为2组,对2组推进油缸的大腔压力进行动态分配.使用ADAMS AMESim Simulink三软件联合仿真,对比分析并联推进系统与姿态自适应推进系统.结果表明:在额定推进力和0.1°、0.3°、0.5°调向角度下,姿态自适应推进系统产生的推进干扰力为并联推进系统的2%,姿态自适应推进系统平行于主梁的推进正压力的超调小于5%.姿态自适应推进系统可以显著减小推进干扰力,具有良好的稳定性.A new adaptive attitude(ADA)tunnel boring machine(TBM)thrust system was proposed to overcome the problem of the service life of critical components and tunnel excavation precision reduced by disturbing force produced by four cylinders connected in parallel(CCP)thrust system.The mathematical model of thrust mechanism was established.Four cylinders were divided into two groups and working pressure of each group was adjusted in real time.The comparison of ADA thrust system and CCP thrust system was conducted by using co-simulation of ADAMS AMESim and Simulink when the deflection angle was 0.1°,0.3°and 0.5°under rated thrust force.Results showed that the disturbing force in ADA thrust system was 2% comparing to disturbing force in CCP thrust system.The overshoot of force paralleled to main beam in ADA thrust system was less than 5%.ADA thrust system can significantly improve performance in reducing the disturbing force,and the system has a good stability.
关 键 词:隧道掘进机(TBM) 推进系统 姿态自适应 干扰力
分 类 号:TH137[机械工程—机械制造及自动化] U455[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.32.173