两种半导体激光治疗仪脱腋毛效果比较  

Clinical Comparative Study of Treating Armpit Hair Between Two Semiconductor Laser Therapeutic Instrument

作　　者：王雪[1] 熊英[1] 郭冰心[1] 陈媛[1] 姜嵩[1] 杜燕飞[1] 万屏[1] 何黎[1] 杨智[1] 

机构地区：[1]昆明医科大学第一附属医院皮肤性病科,云南昆明650032

出　　处：《中国皮肤性病学杂志》2015年第11期1200-1202,共3页The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology

摘　　要：目的评价GP900A半导体激光脱毛治疗仪脱腋毛的临床疗效及安全性。方法将入选的120例女性受试者的左、右侧腋窝随机分为两组，治疗组予GP900A激光皮肤治疗仪治疗，对照组予Ljght Sheer半导体激光治疗仪治疗，均每20—60d治疗1次，共治疗4次，治疗结束后3个月时分别评价治疗有效率、医生和受试者满意度及不良反应。结果治疗组有效率为98．33％，对照组有效率为98．32％，两组比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；治疗组医生满意率98．15％，患者满意率97．28％，二者差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。对照组医生满意率97．35％，患者满意率98．04％，二者差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；治疗组和对照组均未出现不良事件。结论GP900A半导体激光皮肤治疗仪脱毛效果、安全性与Laght Sheer治疗仪相当，且具有成本低，袁皮冷却温度更低的优点，值得临床推广使用。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neotype semiconductor laser hair removal device GP900A forarmpit hair removing. Methods One hundred of twenty cases of female subjects were selected. Both armpits were divided into two groups randomly. Treatment group was treated with GP900A laser device, and the control group with Light Sheer semiconductor laser treatment therapy. Two groups were treated every 20 - 60dfor four times. Effectiveness, doctors and subjects satisfaction and adverse reactions were evaluated at the end of treatment. Results Effective rate in treatment group was 98.33%, and 98.32% in control group. In treatment groups, the doctor satisfaction rate was 98.15%, and the patients was 97.28%. In control groups, the doctor satisfaction rate was 97.35% , and the patients was 98.04%. There was no significant difference between two groups （P 〉 0.05）. All subjects showed no adverse events. Conclusion The depilatory effica- cy and clinical safety of GP900A semiconductor laser hair removal treatment instrument was similar to the Light Sheer treatment instrument. Meanwhile, owning lower costs and epidermal cooling temperature, GP900A treatment instrument is worth to clinical promotion.

关 键 词：半导体激光 脱毛 临床疗效 GP900A 

分 类 号：R751.05[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]