交通、教育与中国农村居民收入——基于省级面板数据的经验研究  

Transportation,Education and Chinese Rural Residents' Income——An Empirical Study Based on Provincial Panel Data

作　　者：袁伟彦[1] 周小柯[2] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学政治与行政学院,广西桂林541004 [2]清华大学公共管理学院,北京100084

出　　处：《当代经济管理》2015年第10期7-14,共8页Contemporary Economic Management

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目<可持续发展理论与解决西部地区贫困问题研究>(10BKS024);马克思主义理论与区域实践协同创新中心资助项目

摘　　要：演基于理论分析, 利用2005-2012 年的省际面板数据实证检验公路交通基础设施建设和教育发展对我国农村居民收入的影响.结果发现 公路密度对我国农村居民纯收入、工资性收入和经营性收入增长均存在显著的正向效应, 但这种效应表现出门槛特征和非对称性; 受教育程度与公路密度的交叉项对农村居民收入也具有正向推动作用, 而且, 受教育程度提高有利于农村居民经营性收入增长, 但在交通条件不同的地区作用大小有差异; 劳动力负担人口和人均耕地面积对农村居民收入的影响随公路密度和农村居民受教育程度而变化.理论分析与实证检验表明, 交通基础设施建设与教育发展在促进我国农村居民收入增长上具有互补、协同效应, 其作用机制是为农村居民家庭劳动力转移和劳动配置优化创造有利的客观与主观条件.Based on theoretical analysis, the article examined the impact of traffic infrastructure construction and education development on Chinese rural residents' income through provincial panel data between 2005 and 2012. The results show that the density of roads has significant positive effects on rural residents' net income, wage income, and operating income. However, a threshold effect and an asymmetry phenomenon do exist; the cross terms of education level and roads density also has a positive effect in promoting rural residents' income. In addition, the education level increase would be beneficial for the increase of rural residents' operating income. However, its effect would be different with various roads density. Meanwhile, the impact of the employed population ratio and per capita arable land on rural residents' income vary with road density or education level. Both the theoretical and the empirical results show that traffic infrastructure construction and education development obtain a complementary and cooperative function in promoting Chinese rural residents' income increase. Its mechanism is that it creates favorable objective and subjective conditions for rural labor force transfer and labor force allocation optimizing.

关 键 词：交通 教育 农村居民收入 面板数据 

分 类 号：F120.3[经济管理—世界经济] F323.8