检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴宜理[1]
机构地区:[1]哈佛大学
出 处:《社会科学》2015年第11期143-145,共3页Journal of Social Sciences
摘 要:由于普遍忽视研究毛泽东时代中国具有里程碑意义的研究成果,在美国学界营造出一个很不完善的当代中国研究的学术氛围,年轻一代的学者实际上在不断进行"重复论证"的工作。尽管(或者说由于)可以利用政府档案,也可以随时来中国进行相关口述访谈,但是这些新近研究的视野都无一例外显得狭窄,对于熟悉早前社会科学研究者的研究著作的人而言,他们几乎没有提供任何令人惊喜的新经验或分析。因此,对于如何在美国更好地推进当代中国史研究,我的建议很简单:回顾而以前行。我们需要认真研习前辈美国社会科学研究者已获得的基础性的学术成果,以期拓展、阐释,必要时推翻他们颇具挑战性的结论和观点。The result of the general neglect of a generation of outstanding landmark studies of Mao's China is that we have a field in the U. S. an underdeveloped field of contemporary Chinese studies in which younger scholars are in effect constantly "reinventing the wheel". Despite (or perhaps because of) the availability of government archives and ready access to interviewees living in the PRC, the new studies are uniformly narrow in scope and offer few empirical or analytical surprises to anyone familiar with the writings of an earlier generation of social scientists. My recommendation for improving the field of contemporary China studies in the U. S. is therefore a simple one: look backward in order to move forward. Let's seriously engage with the foundational scholarship of an earlier generation of American social scientists in order to extend, elaborate -- and, where warranted, to overturn -- their provocative findings and arguments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.108.184