检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘宁国[1] 王涛[1,2] 黄平[1] 秦志强[1] 张建华[1] 陈忆九[1]
机构地区:[1]司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所上海市法医学重点实验室,上海200063 [2]苏州大学医学部法医学系,江苏苏州215123
出 处:《法医学杂志》2015年第5期343-346,共4页Journal of Forensic Medicine
基 金:supported by the Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan Period (2012BAK16B02)
摘 要:过劳死在法医学鉴定中是较为棘手的案件之一。此类案件不仅涉及临床医学,同时也与社会医学相关。日本学者首先开展了心源性猝死与慢性疲劳以及高强度工作相关性的研究。本文中,一名从事搬运水泥袋工作的55岁男性,在持续11天高强度体力劳动后被发现死亡。他的家人状告水泥厂并要求对其死亡进行赔偿。难题在于中国没有此类案例的胜诉先例,也没有相关的法规条例来鉴定死亡与高强度工作的相关性。然而,这些问题最终通过尸体解剖和劳动强度的计算而得以解决。本案成为中国大陆内首例过劳死相关的法庭胜诉案例。Karoshi remains one of the most troublesome issues in forensic identification. It is rather a social medicine than a clinical disease. Japanese scholars pioneered examining the relation between sud- den cardiac death (SCD) and chronic fatigue from long time and/or high-tension work. In the current case, a 55-year-old man, whose job was loading and carrying heavy cement bags, was found dead after 11 days of continuous hard work. His family members sued the cement factory for his death and claimed for compensation. The problem was the difficulty of identifying the causative relation without the precedent or the relevant regulations. However, the forensic problems were finally acknowledged after autopsy and calculation of labor intensity. The lawsuit was won as the first case pertaining to Karoshi in the Chinese court.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.21