公司僵局的司法救济  

Judicial relief of company deadlock

作　　者：林国荣[1] 郑美红[2] 

机构地区：[1]闽江学院法律系,福建福州350108 [2]上海海事大学法学院,上海201306

出　　处：《福建农林大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第5期93-97,共5页Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：福建省教育厅A类课题(JA09206S)

摘　　要：我国现行《公司法》第182条以及相关司法解释的规定,初步构建了司法解决公司僵局的制度。但司法救济途径仅规定强制解散公司,而未规定法院受理公司僵局纠纷的条件、强制解散的具体适用情形,以及恶意诉讼等。立法的滞后导致公司僵局纠纷之救济未能形成一套完整的救济体系。通过对公司僵局纠纷案件的案例研究,分析现有救济途径的不足,探讨公司僵局救济的新路径。The article 182 of the actual company law and the relative judicial interpretation have preliminarily structured the system of resolving the company deadlock by laws. But the judicial way has only stipulated compulsive dissolution of company,without the condition for the court to accept and hear such cases,even without the specific application of it and the malicious litigation etc.There has not been a whole judicial relief system of company deadlock because of lagging legislation. This paper focuses on finding a new way to resolve company deadlock based on empirical study of company deadlock cases and the analysis of the deficiency of the actual judicial practice.

关 键 词：公司僵局 司法救济 

分 类 号：D923.991[政治法律—民商法学]