论中国足协行业规范的法源地位  

Legal Status of Chinese Football Industry Standard

作　　者：韦志明[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012 [2]韩山师范学院政法系,广东潮州521041

出　　处：《天津体育学院学报》2015年第3期228-233,共6页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金第56批面上资助项目(项目编号:2014M561278)

摘　　要：立法立场的法源观和司法立场的法源观本质上是一种国家法源观,这种法源观已经不能有效地回应法律实践的需要,因此,需走出国家法源观,从形式性认知向功能性认知转变,把法律渊源理解为"有说服性论据"更能解释社会现实。在一些司法案例中,法院之所以把中国足协的行业自治规范用作裁判规范,因为这些自治规范能为法院的判决提供"有说服力论据",而这种说服力建立在足协行业规范的专业理性和秩序正义基础之上。从法理上看,中国足协的行业管理制定权中有法律授权属性,给这种制定权加入了"公权"属性,增加了中国足协行业自治规范"法律硬度",进而在公信力方面为行政执法和法律适用提供更有"说服性"的法源论据,故中国足协行业规范应在中国法律渊源体系中应占有一席之地。不同的法源类别意味着其在法律渊源适用中的地位与作用不同,同时也会对法律适用者产生不同的优位排序思维。在中国语境中,应把足协行业自治规范归于非正式法源类别为宜,由此也决定了其在法律渊源体系中的辅助性功用和次层级地位,它对于法院的法源论证只具说服性效力。在中国足协行业自治规范与其他法源之间的识别问题上,应把正式法源优位地位思维与行业自治规范等非正式法源的辅助性功用统一于语境化运用中。The legal status of legislation is the same with that of justice, which is state legal status. This legal status cannot effectively respond to the needs of the legal practice. So, going through state legal status and turning from formal cognition to functional cognition, understanding legal origin to convincing argument, prefer to explain social truth. In some judicial cases, courts used the Chinese football association industry autonomy specification as the referee specification, because these autonomous specification can offer＂convincing evidence＂for the court＇s decision, and this kind of persuasive specification based on professional rational justice and order basis. From legal point of view, the Chinese football association industry management have legally authorized at-tribute, which give this right to join the＂public power＂attribute, which increased the Chinese football association industry autonomy standard＂law hardness＂,and the applicable law for administrative law enforcement in terms of credibility and provide more ＂persuasive＂source argument. So, the Chinese football association industry specifications have a place in Chinese legal origin. Different legal origin means different status and function in applying, which, at the same time, make the law applier have different thought of sequence. In Chinese statement, football industry standard should attribute to informal legal origin,which decide its subsidiary function and secondary status in legal origin and only have convincing efficacy in court legal origin argument. Between the Chinese football association industry specifications and other legal status source identification problem, the formal legal source optimal position thinking and formal source industry self-government norms such as informal source of auxiliary function should be unity in contextual application.

关 键 词：法律渊源 足协行业规范 法源地位 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]