检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]平凉市第二人民医院泌尿外科,甘肃平凉744000 [2]天津市人民医院泌尿外科
出 处:《西部中医药》2015年第9期131-133,共3页Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨超声双探头联合定位法体外冲击波碎石的优势,方法:将泌尿系结石患者280例(结石大小6~12 mm)随机分为试验组和对照组各140例,试验组采用床旁固定探头与超声机活动探头联合定位法,对照组采用床旁固定探头定位法,2组均行体外冲击波碎石,观察2组患者定位时间、定位成功率、碎石效果。结果:试验组定位时间为(10.38±2.41)min,定位成功率为97.14%(136/140),碎石成功率为94.29%(132/140);对照组定位时间为(11.02±2.36)min,定位成功率为91.43%(128/140),碎石成功率为87.14%(122/140)。结论:超声双探头联合定位法与单探头定位法进相比,行体外冲击波碎石的定位时间明显缩短,定位成功率及碎石成功率明显提高。Objective: To explore the advantages of ultrasonic double probes joint localization method applied to extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods: All 280 patients (stone size: 6-12mm) were randomized into the experiment group and the control group, 140 cases each group, the experiment group accepted joint localization method by bedside fixed probe combined with ultrasonic mobile probe, and the control group localization method by bedside fixed probe, both groups received extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, to observe localization time, localization success rate and lithotripsy effects of both groups. Results: Localization time of the experiment group was (10.38 ±2.41) minutes, localization success rate was 97.14%(136/140), lithotripsy success rate was 94.29% (132/140); shorter than (11.02 ± 2.36) minutes of the control group, higher than 91.43% (128/140) and 87.14%(122/140) of the control group. Conclusion: Compared with single probe localization method, ultrasonic double probes joint localization method could shorten localization time, improve localization success rate and lithotripsy success rate obviously in extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30