洁净与肮脏:侗族传统民居建造仪式场域中的群体符号边界  

Purity and Pollution: Groups' Symbolic Boundaries in Construction Ritual Filed Of Traditional Dong Dwellings

作　　者：赵巧艳[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学漓江学院管理系,广西桂林541006 [2]中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所博士后流动站,北京100081

出　　处：《贵州民族研究》2015年第9期83-87,共5页Guizhou Ethnic Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"新型城镇化进程中侗族村落空间优化与生态人居环境建设研究"(14BMZ100);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"空间实践与文化表征:侗族传统民居的象征人类学研究"(13YJC850030);广西哲学社会科学规划课题一般项目"社会机制构建与广西非物质文化遗产保护的可持续性研究(13BMZ007);广西高等学校优秀中青年骨干教师培养工程

摘　　要：洁净与肮脏两个对立概念形成的术语体系在提供分类标准与原则的同时,也为区分不同社会群体提供了观念指导与实践准则,构建了族群、阶层、社会和文化边界。借助道格拉斯的洁净/肮脏二元对立术语体系,分别从女性群体和阈限实体两个角度,深描侗族传统民居建造仪式中所体现出的社会类别化现象,以及洁净与肮脏观念所赋予的仪式场域中不同性质社会群体的差别化边界符号。The term system composed by two contradictory words – purity and dirtiness provides not only standard and principles for categorization, it can also be regarded as conceptual direction and practice guide lines for social group differentiation. Taking the construction ritual of traditional Dong dwellings as cut point and detailed field investigation as foundation, with references to the term system of purity and dirtiness, the thesis discussed profoundly the phenomena of conceptual and practical social separation inside the field space of traditional Dong dwellings construction from two aspects of gender and liminal entities. The differentiated boundary symbols of various social groups imposed by the notion of purity and dirtiness in ritual field was also discussed.

关 键 词：侗族传统民居 仪式 洁净 符号边界 

分 类 号：TU253.72[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论] C913.317.2[经济管理]