检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京100872
出 处:《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第6期87-94,共8页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家林业局林业软科学研究项目(2014-R08);福建科技厅省属公益类科研专项(闽林2013第38号)
摘 要:新一轮林权制度改革之后,小农户与大市场、林地细碎化与规模化经营、个人利益与社区公共利益之间的矛盾不断凸显,集体经营的重要性重新受到决策者和地方社区的关注。在部分地区,集体管理的森林不仅保留了下来,而且呈现出多样化的经营绩效。通过比较成功(L村)和失败经营(Y村)的案例,运用Ostrom、Wade和Agrawal的影响成功公共治理的条件要件,从资源特征、依赖于资源的集体特征、资源特征与集体特征、管理制度细节、资源特征与管理制度的关系和外部环境6个方面进行具体分析,探讨塑造成功集体管理森林的资源、社区和制度条件,从而为我国新型林业经营主体的多元化提供经验。After the new round of forest property reform, individual management entity has been strengthened, and too scattered entities leads to more conflicts between small household and big market, forest land fragmenta- tion and large-scale management, private interests and common interests. Therefore, both decision makers and lo- cal communities attach importance again to collective management. In some places, collective management has been restored and gives very different performance. Through comparing two collective forest farms, a successful one and a failed one in collective forest management, and using key factors of conditions for successful management like Os- trom, Wad and Agrawal, this essay discusses the f^atures of resources, community and institutions for a successful collective management; offering experience for diversification of new forest management entity in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117