检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福州大学法学院,福建福州350108 [2]福建社会科学院,福建福州350001
出 处:《三明学院学报》2015年第5期44-48,共5页Journal of Sanming University
摘 要:随着中国改革的深入,法治观念深入人心,人民群众对司法审判关注度日益提高,产生了司法审判向社会舆论倾斜的趋势。法院的独立审判是实现公正的保障,是现代法治社会的重要表现,是依法治国的重要手段,而正当的法律推理能规范和保障法院审判的独立行使。从李昌奎案件切入,立足法律推理的视角上,对内在法律逻辑进行分析,探究社会舆论对法院独立审判权造成的影响,由此可以发现,维护司法公正必须坚持正当的法律推理,坚持法院审判的独立性,排除社会舆论对法院审判的干预。With the deepening of China's reform, the rule of law concept deeply rooted among the people of the increasing concern about the administration of justice, resulting in the administration of justice to tilt public opinion trends. Independent trial court is to achieve the security of justice. The rule of law is an important manifestation of modern society and the proper legal reasoning which can regulate and safeguard the independent exercise of the trial court. Taking Li Changkui case as a starting point, the internal logic of the law is analyzed from the perspective of legal reasoning, which aims to explore the negative impact of public opinion on the cause of independence of the court jurisdiction. It can be found that we must adhere to proper legal reasoning, adhere to the independence of the courts, the exclusion of public opinion on the trial court's intervention in order to safeguard judicial justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.200.8