竞争中立:多元形式与中国应对  

Competitive Neutrality: Diverse Forms and China's Response

作　　者：应品广[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]上海对外经贸大学WTO研究教育学院 [2]上海高校智库国际经贸治理与中国改革开放联合研究中心

出　　处：《国际商务研究》2015年第6期62-69,共8页International Business Research

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"中国竞争政策研究"(项目编号:13CFX085);上海市教委科研创新项目和上海地方高校085工程项目"国际经贸治理中的竞争中立议题研究"

摘　　要：竞争中立要求政府在市场竞争问题上对不同所有制企业一视同仁。国际上推广和实现竞争中立的形式有3种:一是国内立法,二是国际组织的"最佳实践"或"指南",三是区域或自由贸易协定。不同形式体现了不同立场和诉求。中国可以在国际、国内两个层面作出回应:在国际层面,中国可以主张全球竞争的实质公平,指出竞争中立作为国内措施和国际规则的不同,在参与双边或区域协定谈判时提出符合自身需求的竞争中立主张;在国内层面,短期内中国可以借助于国内自贸区试验探索国有企业的竞争中立,长期来看则需要构建符合自身需求的竞争中立制度体系。Competitive neutrality requires the governments to treat public and private enterprises with no discrimination. There are basically three forms of promoting competitive neutrality： （1） through domestic legislation; （2） through ＂Best Practices＂ or ＂Guidelines＂ by international organizations; （3） by RTAs or FTAs. Different forms reflect varying positions and pursuit. China can respond in both international and domestic dimensions. At the international dimension, China can pursue the ＂substantive fairness＂ of global competition, persist the difference of competitive neutrality as domestic reform measures and international binding rules, and propose propositions meeting its own needs when participating in FTA negotiations. At the domestic dimension, in the short term China can explore competitive neutrality within the domestic Free Trade Area, and in the long term China shall build its own competitive neutrality system.

关 键 词：竞争中立 国企改革 TPP TTIP RCEP 

分 类 号：DF961[政治法律—国际法学]