检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季美君[1]
机构地区:[1]最高人民检察院检察理论研究所,北京100144
出 处:《国家检察官学院学报》2015年第6期36-45,168-169,共10页Journal of National Prosecutors College
摘 要:澳大利亚刑事司法制度比较完善,但少量的刑事错案仍会出现。在错案救济赔偿方面,各州多采用特惠赔偿制度,首府地区还在立法中明确规定了错案的定义及赔偿条件。由于错案在成因上具有执法者的不当行为、科学证据的不当解读及媒体报道的不良影响等诸多共性,在错案难以杜绝的情况下,澳大利亚各司法辖区采取增加上诉次数、规定错案赔偿条件以及将无辜者DNA检测立法化等改革措施,为被错误定罪的无辜者提供更多而有效的洗冤渠道。Though Australia has a good criminal justice system,a relatively small number of demonstrated wrongful convictions still occurred. As to the compensation,Australian states and territories can make discretionary ex gratia payments,although determination of compensation amounts is unclear. Australian Capital Territory stipulates the definition and circumstances of wrongful conviction in the Human Rights Act 2004. Due to common systemic causes,such as police or prosecutor misconduct,flawed scientific evidence as well as the destructive consequences of the media,some jurisdictions have taken recent reforms of corrective measures to provide those convicted but innocent people with more avenues to prove their innocence,such as establishing a second or subsequent statutory right of appeal,providing circumstances of compensation and legislating DNA innocence testing to applicants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.42.14