一次性包皮环切缝合器与包皮环环切术的临床疗效比较  

Clinical Curative Effect Comparison of Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and Circumcision

作　　者：陶美满[1] 郭涛[1] 周留正[1] 朱贵如[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏大学附属医院,江苏镇江212001

出　　处：《中外医学研究》2015年第31期8-10,共3页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH

摘　　要：目的:对一次性包皮环切缝合器与包皮环环切术的疗效进行分析。方法:选择笔者所在医院门诊2014年1月-2015年3月预约包皮过长、包茎患者162例,依据患者自愿原则进行分组治疗,其中80例包皮过长和包茎患者行包皮环(商环)包皮环切术(包皮环组),另外82例行包皮环切缝合术(缝合器组),对手术时间、出血量、伤口愈合时间、术后疼痛、术后并发症及术后外观满意度等进行对比分析。结果:缝合器组与包皮环组手术时间、术中出血量方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但缝合器组术后疼痛、感染、水肿、伤口愈合时间均显著低于包皮环组(P<0.05),外观满意度明显高于包皮环组(P<0.05)。结论:一次性包皮环切缝合术操作简单、安全,患者痛苦小,并发症少,患者术后满意度高,值得临床推广使用。Objective：To explore the clinical curative effects of disposable circumcision suture device and circumcision.Method：162 patients with redundant prepuce and phimosis in our hospital from January 2014 to March 2015 were selected,according to the idea of the patiens, 80 cases were received circumcision（Shang Ring group）, and 82 cases were received disposable circumcision suture device（suture device group）.The operation time,blood loss,time of wound healing,postoperative pain score, postoperative complications and postoperative satisfaction with penile appearance of the two groups were compared.Result：In suture device group,the operation time and blood loss had no statistical significance compared with Shang Ring group（P〈0.05）.Otherwise there were significant differences existed in the postoperative pain score,infection, the incidence of hydrophallus,time to wound healing between two groups（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：The procedure with disposable circumcision suture device is much more simpler,microinvasive,safer,has less pain and good outlook.So it is worth popularizing.

关 键 词：包皮过长 包茎 包皮环环切术 一次性包皮环切缝合器 

分 类 号：R699.8[医药卫生—泌尿科学]