健康促进与健康教育干预社区中老年亚健康患者的效果评估  

Effect evaluation of health promotion and health education intervention in middle-aged and elderly sub-healthy patients

作　　者：廖生武[1] 梁有丽 郭东英 阮伟清[3] 雷晓莉 周光清[3] 伍星[3] 

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学南方医院急诊片区党总支,广东广州510515 [2]南方医科大学南方医院妇产科,广东广州510515 [3]南方医科大学南方医院健康管理科,广东广州510515 [4]广东省高要市人民医院审计科,广东东莞526020

出　　处：《中国医药导报》2015年第32期127-129,133,共4页China Medical Herald

基　　金：广东省科技计划项目(2012B031800467)

摘　　要：目的探讨健康促进与健康教育干预社区中老年亚健康患者的效果。方法选取2010年12月广州市同和社区的88例中老年亚健康患者为研究对象,随机分成观察组和对照组,每组各44例。分别给予医院层面+社区层面+家庭层面的综合干预措施和单一的干预措施和方法。观察并比较两组的综合疗效和症状评分。结果临床总有效率,观察组显著高于对照组(93.18%比56.82%),差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01);实施干预后,两组研究对象的亚健康症状积分水平观察组显著低于对照组[(4.32±0.63)分比(10.23±3.10)分],差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论与单一的干预措施相比较,采用医院、社区、家庭联合干预措施和方法可有效改善社区中老年人亚健康状态,是实践过程中的理想选择方式。Objective To explore effect of health promotion and health education intervention in middle-aged and elderly sub healthy patients in the community. Methods In December 2010 in Tonghe Community of Guangzhou City, 88 cases middle-aged and elderly sub healthy patients were selected as research objects. They were randomly divided into observation group and control group. They were given comprehensive intervention measures of hospital level ＋ community level ＋ family level and single intervention measures and methods repestively. The effects and symptom score of two groups were observed and compared. Results The total clinical efficiency of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group（93.18% vs 56.82%）, with statistical significance difference（P〈0.01）; After intervention, the sub healthy symptom scores of subjects of observation group was significantly lower than that of control group[（4.32±0.63） score vs（10.23±3.10） score], with statistical significance difference（P〈0.01）. Conclusion Compared with single intervention measures, the hospital, community and family joint intervention measures and methods can effectively improve community middle-aged and elderly sub healthy state, which is the ideal choice for practice.

关 键 词：联合干预 亚健康 干预效果 

分 类 号：R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]