检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林振海[1] 李军华[1] 魏海龙[1] 肖洪伟[1]
机构地区:[1]海南省农垦那大医院胸外科,海南儋州571700
出 处:《中国中西医结合消化杂志》2015年第10期684-686,共3页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Digestion
基 金:中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金(No;11321247)
摘 要:[目的]探讨食管癌三野淋巴结清扫术食管胃颈部吻合口机械吻合对术后吻合口并发症影响情况。[方法]选取2002年2月-2014年11月我院收治82例食管癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组,2组患者术后颈部分别采用机械吻合和人工吻合,比较2组吻合时间、吻合费用及吻合口瘘和吻合口狭窄发生情况。[结果]观察组吻合时间明显短于对照组[(15.1±4.6)min(29.4±4.3)min,P〈0.05];观察组吻合费用明显高于对照组[(3698.6±356.1)元(325.5±22.8)元,P〈0.05]。观察组吻合口瘘发生率为2.44%,对照组发生率为7.32%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。观察组吻合口狭窄发生率为19.51%明显高于对照组2.44%,比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。[结论]食管癌三野淋巴结清扫术食管胃机械吻合相比人工吻合操作简单、吻合效果显著,但可增加吻合费用,提高吻合口狭窄发生率,临床中应根据具体情况进行吻合方式选择,以获得最佳吻合效果。[Objective]To investigate the effect of esophageal three field lymphadenectomy gastroesophageal anastomotic mechanical cervical anastomosis on anastomotic complications.[Methods]From February2002 to November 2014,82 cases of esophageal cancer patients in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group.Mechanical anastomosis and artificial anastomosis were applied for postoperative neck respectively.Then anastomosis time,anastomosis cost,anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stricture occurrence of the both groups were compared.[Results]Anastomosis time of the observation group was significantly shorter than the control group[(15.1±4.6)min vs.(29.4±4.3)min,P〈0.05];anastomosis cost of the observation group was obviously higher than the control group[(3698.6±356.1)yuanvs.(325.5±22.8)yuan,P〈0.05].The anastomotic fistula incidence of the observation group was2.44%,in the control group the rate was 7.32%,and the difference between the two groups had no statistical significance(P〈0.05);incidence of anastomotic stenosis in the observation group was 19.51%,apparently higher than that of the control group 2.44%,and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).[Conclusion]Compared with artificial anastomosis,esophageal three-field lymphadenectomy gastroesophageal anastomotic mechanical operation was simple and effective,but increased the cost of anastomosis and the incidence of anastomotic stenosis.Doctors should choose suitable method to achieve the best fit effect according to the specific circumstances.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30