广西西江经济带城市旅游竞争力评价  

GUANGXI XIJIANG ECONOMIC BELT URBAN TOURISM COMPETITIVENESS EVALUATION

作　　者：吴娟[1,2] 甘永萍[1,2] 许小红[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范学院北部湾环境演变与资源利用教育部重点实验室广西地表过程与智能模拟重点实验室,广西南宁530001 [2]广西师范学院旅游学院,广西南宁530001

出　　处：《云南地理环境研究》2015年第5期43-49,共7页Yunnan Geographic Environment Research

基　　金：广西师范学院北部湾环境演变与资源利用省部共建教育部重点实验室系统基金项目(2014BGERLXT21)资助

摘　　要：基于因子分析方法,以广西西江经济带7个城市为研究对象,从旅游现状竞争力、旅游支持竞争力、旅游潜力竞争力3个方面评价了7市的旅游竞争力状况。结果发现:南宁综合旅游竞争力得分为1.99,位列第一,归为强旅游竞争力城市;柳州综合旅游竞争力得分为0.33,位列第二,归为较强旅游竞争力城市;崇左综合旅游竞争力得分为-0.14,归为一般旅游竞争力城市;梧州、贵港、百色、来宾的综合旅游竞争力得分均低于-0.45,归为弱旅游竞争力城市。针对各类旅游竞争力城市存在的问题,提出相应的发展对策。Based on factor analysis method, and the 7 city of Guangxi Xijiang River economic belt as the research object. The competitiveness of the 7 cities was evaluated from 3 aspects： the status of tourism, tourism support competitiveness, and tourism potential competitiveness. The results showed that, Nanning＇s comprehen- sive tourism competitiveness score was 1.99, which ranked first and classified as the strongest tourism competi- tiveness city. Liuzhou＇s corresponding score was 0. 33, which ranked second and classified as the stronger tourism competitiveness city. Score of Chongzuo was - 0. 14, which classified as the general tourism competitiveness city. The comprehensive score Wuzhou, Guigang, Baise, Laibin all were less than - 0. 45, which classified as the weak tourism competitiveness city. Aiming at the existing problems, the countermeasures are put forward. According to the existing problems of different types of cities, the corresponding countermeasures are put forward.

关 键 词：因子分析 城市旅游竞争力 广西西江经济带 

分 类 号：F59[经济管理—旅游管理]