检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:颜红宇[1] 龚牡丽[2] 吴素蓉[1] 王文艺[1] 纪军[1]
机构地区:[1]井冈山大学医务所,江西省吉安市343009 [2]吉安市妇幼保健院
出 处:《临床合理用药杂志》2015年第24期173-174,共2页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
摘 要:目的探讨改良破伤风皮试液配制方法对皮试阳性率的影响。方法选取2012年3月—2014年11月井冈山大学医务所收治的外伤患者159例,随机分为观察组(81例)与对照组(78例)。对照组患者予以传统破伤风皮试液配制方法,观察组患者予以改良皮试液配制方法。观察两组患者皮试阳性率。结果观察组患者皮试阳性率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论改良破伤风皮试液配制方法能降低患者皮试阳性率,减轻患者的痛苦。Objective To explore the impact of improved tetanus skin test liquid dispensing method on skin test positive rate. Methods A total of 159 patients with trauma were selected in Clinic of Jinggangshan University from March 2012 to November 2014,they were randomly divided into observation group( 81 cases) and control group( 78 cases). Control group were given traditional tetanus skin test liquid dispensing method,observation group were given improved tetanus skin test liquid dispensing method. Skin reaction positive rate between the two groups was compared. Results Skin reaction positive rate of observation group was lower than that of control group( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Improved tetanus skin test liquid dispensing method can reduce the skin test positive rate and reduce the pain of the patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7