中外赃款赃物追缴与案外人财产权保护制度比较——以中俄刑事扣押制度为视角  

The System Comparison about Illicit Money and Goods Recovered and the Third Party's Property of China and Foreign——Perspective of Chinese and Russian Criminal Detention System

作　　者：龙建明[1] 

机构地区：[1]凯里学院马克思主义学院,贵州凯里556011

出　　处：《青海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第5期54-58,共5页Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科后期资助项目"刑事被追诉人权利救济制度研究"(14FFX043);贵州省社科规划办课题"赃款赃物追缴与案外人财产权保护研究"(14GZYB22)

摘　　要：刑事扣押既是赃款赃物追缴的一种有效手段,也是侵害他人财产权的一种利器。同俄罗斯立法相比,我国刑事扣押制度设计存在诸多缺陷,如扣押被定性为一种普通侦查行为而非强制措施、侦查机关无需司法审查就可自己决定和实施扣押、对扣押笔录的制作要求简陋、未赋予专家有权参与扣押及关于扣押救济方式设定不合理。我国可以俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法为参照,对扣押制度予以完善,如将扣押界定为强制措施,构建扣押司法审查程序;要求扣押应制作详细笔录;允许可聘请专家参与扣押;当事人对非法扣押可直接向法院申诉。Criminal detention is both an effective means ot recovery oi proceeas o~ cHm~, ,u weapon against the property of others. Compared with Russian legislation, the criminal detention system design of many defects, such as the seizure of the qualitative behavior rather than as an ordinary investiga- tive coercive measures, the investigating authorities can decide for themselves without iudicial review and the arrest, seizure record crude production requirements, did not give the right to participate in seizure and experts on the remedies set unreasonable seizure. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation can as a reference system for the seizure to be perfect, as will be defined as a seizure of coercive measures, build seizure judicial review procedures; require the seizure shall prepare a detailed record; permit can hire experts to participate in the seizure; party unlawfully detaining directly access to the courts.

关 键 词：刑事扣押 赃款赃物追缴 强制措施 司法审查 权利救济 

分 类 号：D922[政治法律—法学]