民法上的和解合同新探  

The New Exploration of the Compromise Contract in the Civil law

作　　者：李早早 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2015年第5期23-28,共6页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：目前,和解合同在我国民法上还是一纸空白,然而就司法实践以及比较法上来看,和解合同从无名合同转变为有名合同已是必然趋势。学者们虽然对和解合同已有诸多论述,但仍然存在问题需要予以澄清。在其性质方面,和解合同应为具有形式上的独立性、兼具物权与债权、实体性质的合同;在概念方面,应将其与诉讼上和解合同、调解加以区分,从而准确把握和解合同在未来民法典中的地位;在效力方面,突破传统的"认定效"与"创设效"之争,主张在准确把握和解合同与其基础法律关系的基础上,将其效力归结为"确认效力"、"变更效力"和"创设效力"。At present,the compromise contract in the civil law in China is still a blank paper.？From the perspective of judicialpractice and comparison method,however,the compromise contract from nameless contract to famous is inevitable trend.？Althoughscholars have been a lot of discussion on the reconciliation agreement,but there are still issues that need to be clarified.In terms ofits nature,the settlement agreement should have formal independence,both property rights and debt, tangible nature of contracts; interms of concept, it should be a settlement contract with the litigation, mediation distinction to accurately grasp the reconciliationagreement position in the future Civil Code; in effectiveness, breaking the traditional ＂that effect＂ and the ＂creation effect＂ of thedispute,and claiming the contract on the basis of an accurate grasp of reconciliation on its underlying legal relationship, itseffectiveness will be attributed to ＂confirm the validity＂ ＂change effect＂ and ＂the creation of effectiveness＂.

关 键 词：和解合同 诉讼上和解 调解 效力 基础法律关系 

分 类 号：DF525[政治法律—民商法学]