检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马岭[1]
出 处:《河南财经政法大学学报》2015年第6期1-7,共7页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基 金:2015年北京市社会科学基金重大项目"我国宪法实施制度的改进与完善"的阶段性成果(项目编号:503000120401)
摘 要:与《中华人民共和国立法法》只能推论出社会团体、企业事业组织以及公民有提出法律解释的建议权不同,有关专家起草的《中华人民共和国宪法解释程序法(专家建议稿)》明确规定这些组织及个人有宪法解释的提起权,其第十一条规定了个人请求的条件,即宪法诉愿制度;但这并非赋予他们在具体审查性解释和抽象审查性解释中的提请权。准司法化应是我国目前宪法解释的发展方向,通过司法途径将民间的活力纳入国家机关体系,是克服官僚主义的根本之道,也是激活宪法实施制度最简便、最有效的措施。Inferring from the regulations of Law on Legislation,we could come to the conclusion that the social groups, enterprises,institutions or individual citizens have the right to make a suggestion about the legal inter- pretation. However, the Proposal Drafted by the Experts clearly stated that the above organizations or individu- als have the right to constitutional interpretation proposals. And article 11 of the Proposal regulated the condi- tions of individual application, which is the mechanism of constitutional complaints. On the other hand, this mechanism doesn' t confer the submitting power of interpretations on them in the abstract review or concrete re- view. The development of our constitutional interpretation should follow the path of quasi -judicialization, which is to institutionalize the individual applications through the channel of judiciary. This is a fundamental method to exclude the bureaucracy and the most efficient and simple way to activate all the mechanisms of constitutional enforcement.
关 键 词:社团企业事业组织及个人 宪法解释 抽象审查性解释 具体审查性解释 宪法诉愿
分 类 号:D921.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.105.128