CRISPR/Cas9系统中sgRNA设计与脱靶效应评估  被引量:23

sg RNA design for the CRISPR/Cas9 system and evaluation of its off-target effects

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:谢胜松[1] 张懿[2] 张利生[1] 李广磊[1] 赵长志[1] 倪攀[1] 赵书红[1] 

机构地区:[1]华中农业大学,农业动物遗传育种与繁殖教育部重点实验室,武汉430070 [2]中国人民解放军第161医院妇产科,武汉430010

出  处:《遗传》2015年第11期1125-1136,共12页Hereditas(Beijing)

基  金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(编号:2662015BQ005);广东省分子与细胞工程育种团队(编号:2011A020102003);国家自然科学基金项目(编号:31301226)资助

摘  要:基于CRISPR/Cas9系统介导的第三代基因组编辑技术,已成功应用于动物、植物和微生物等诸多物种的基因组改造。如何提高CRISPR/Cas9技术的基因组编辑效率和最大限度降低脱靶风险一直是本领域的研究热点,而使用高效且特异的sg RNA(Small guide RNA)是基因组改造成功的关键性因素之一。目前,已有多款针对CRISPR/Cas9技术的sg RNA设计和/或脱靶效应评估软件,但不同的软件各有优缺点。本文重点对16款sg RNA设计和脱靶效应评估在线和单机版软件的特点进行了阐述,通过制定38项评估指标对不同软件进行了比较分析,最后对11种用于检测基因组编辑效率和脱靶的实验方法,以及如何筛选高效且特异的sg RNA进行了归纳总结。The third generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technology has been successfully applied to genome modification of various species including animals, plants and microorganisms. How to improve the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and reduce its off-target effects has been extensively explored in this field. Using sg RNA(Small guide RNA) with high efficiency and specificity is one of the critical factors for successful genome editing. Several software have been developed for sg RNA design and/or off-target evaluation, which have advantages and disadvantages respectively. In this review, we summarize characters of 16 kinds online and standalone software for sg RNA design and/or off-target evaluation and conduct a comparative analysis of these different kinds of software through developing 38 evaluation indexes. We also summarize 11 experimental approaches for testing genome editing efficiency and off-target effects as well as how to screen highly efficient and specific sg RNA.

关 键 词:CRISPR/Cas9系统 基因组编辑 sgRNA 脱靶效应 

分 类 号:Q78[生物学—分子生物学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象